The battle over "faith values" has never been very amicable but every once in a while I see some things that makes shows just how nasty it can get.
Recently news broke of a "pro-family" group being sued for using the engagement photo of a gay couple without their permission in a campaign flier.
Think about that, imagine a photo from your life taken out of context edited and then used in material made public actively attacking your lifestyle.
Worse still, the group in question considers homosexuality and atheism as immoral behaviours and beliefs - However you cut it "immorality" is a personal attack, there is nothing general about it.
Think about a blonde couple getting married and then having their engagement photos used to promote the idea that blondes are stupid.
Could you take a part of someones private life who you do not know (the photo in question was taking off the internet) and use that to publicly represent a view that you know would be totally contrary to the values of that person?
I dont think I could bring myself to invade and violate the privacy of others in such a blatant way.
To be honest however I dont think this is representative of the values of the faith in question, but more of the individuals who put together the pamphlet. It's just ironic that someone working for a cause that claims the moral high ground should stoop to theft (they took a professionally taken photo without attempting to pay rights or royalties), deception (the photo was edited to change it's setting), and lies (the pamphlet implied that homosexual relationships were preferred by the candidate it was attacking) in order to prove their point.
For the record I would be just as upset if anyone ran an anti-faith campaign using the same tactics.
As I said, the actions fo these people are not representative of faith but they are representative of politics where artificially stimulated emotional reactions are more important than verifiable facts and rational arguments.
The fact that anyone would be swayed by such a document just goes to show that some people are only looking for an excuse to believe a certain way, not a reason to do so. These ends cannot justify the means for a christian group or any other group that grasps the morality of the golden rule.
"Do unto others as you would have them do unto you."
It's not perfect and it's not easy, but it's a good place to start.